About Me

My photo
Science communication is important in today's technologically advanced society. A good part of the adult community is not science savvy and lacks the background to make sense of rapidly changing technology. My blog attempts to help by publishing articles of general interest in an easy to read and understand format without using mathematics. You can contact me at ektalks@yahoo.co.uk

Tuesday, 28 June 2016

The Avian Egg - Marvel of Nature's Architecture - How Eggs Scale with Bird Size - Adaptation to Different Environments

Blog Contents - Who am I?

Introduction:  The structure and function of complex organisms are subject to the laws of physics and chemistry.  Organisms vary in size (and shape) over an extremely large range. How size affects their structure and function is a fascinating subject - the study is called allometric scaling.  In this blog, I shall look at scaling of avian eggs - probably one of the simplest systems for such a study. 


Eggs of different birds are roughly similar in shape and are some of the simplest structures available.  Scaling behaviour of eggs points to a common reproductive strategy in birds. One can attempt to explain deviations from simple scaling behaviour as adaptations to prevailing environmental factors.

What is an egg? -   An egg (ovum) is essentially a reproductive cell produced by the female. The ovum is fertilized by the male spermOnce fertilized, the egg has a full complement of chromosomes and genes for development. The fertilized cell (zygote) then rapidly divides to produce a developing embryo.  An avian or bird egg is designed to nourish and protect the embryo growing from the zygote
Each fertile egg contains everything, except oxygen, to support the subsequent development of the embryo during incubation. The egg needs only a warm humid environment and oxygen while the embryo is maturing. A healthy chick hatches at the end of incubation.
In mammals, the embryo develops inside the mother receiving its nourishment through the placenta; the baby is delivered to the outside world on maturity.

About Birds:  Birds sizes range from 3 g hummingbirds to the now extinct elephant bird (Aepyornis) weighing over 500 kg - a mass range greater than 150,000.  Their eggs weigh from 0.3 g to 10 kg - a range of over 30,000.  

This is shown in the following two slides:
(Click on a slide to view its full page image)


Both slides are based on data from Rahn et al and are from Michael Dickison's PhD thesis
Please note that the egg mass is in grams but the female body mass is in kg. 

Within a bird species, the variation appears to follow closely an exponent of 0.77.  Different species have a significant variation in the egg to body weight ratio but eggs of a species closely follow the 0.77 exponent with bird mass (parallel lines in the slide) .

Small birds invest a large amount of energy, of the order of 20% of their body weight, to produce their  eggs - eggs of smaller birds are a bigger percentage of their body weight. Human babies weigh about 6% of their mother's body weight.  An avian egg contains all the essential nutritional provisions required for the development of a chick - increased egg weight represents the extra investment by the bird.  Notice the New Zealand Kiwi (Apteryx) has a disproportionately large egg - we shall discuss some of the ideas to throw light on why this might be so.
What does an Egg contain?:  A newly laid egg contains everything, except oxygen, needed to form a complete hatching bird.  The following slide gives a case study for a chicken egg:
Designing an Avian Egg:  An egg is a complex structure.  Its various parts are shown in the following slide


 

In the rest of this blog, I shall use egg mass as the independent variable - conversion to bird mass is easily achieved using the scaling law given in the second slide.


The egg takes a certain time for the chick to develop - the incubation time.  During this period, the egg loses water to the outside and this water is supplied by the egg.  The space occupied by water vapour is replaced by air diffusing from outside and results in the air cell (number 7 in the previous slide) growing larger. 
For a chicken egg, the optimum temperature for incubation is 38 C.

The incubation time depends on the initial egg weight.  This was studied by Rhan for a large range of bird species. Incubation time of eggs across the bird species is shown in the next slide.   


The transfer of gases, water vapour, oxygen and carbon di-oxide, is governed by Fick's law of diffusion that states:
Conductance of fluids is proportional to the total pore area (individual pore area times number of pores) and inversely proportional to the pore length (shell thickness).
Avian eggs appear to employ some very interesting adaptation strategies in response to environmental and other conditions.  We shall look at some examples later but let us talk about the structure of the egg shell first.
EGG SHELLS:  Egg shells are made of calcium carbonate (density = 2 g/cc) and provide protection for the embryo. Eggs do not vary enormously in overall shape - their surface area scales as 0.666 power of the weight and volume.
Although bird eggs appear to be fragile, they are in fact extremely robust.  The oval shape applies the same rules of engineering as arched bridges; the convex surface can withstand considerable pressure without breaking.  This is essential if the egg is not to crack under the weight of the incubating bird.  It takes 12 kg equivalent of pressure to break a swan's egg and 55 kg for an ostrich egg.
The relation of the egg shell weight to the total egg weight is shown in the next slide:
The relative increase in the weight of the egg shell for larger birds is entirely due to the increase in the thickness of the shell.  Thickness of the shell determines its strength against breaking - larger eggs have to support the heavier mass of the parent bird that does the incubating and all eggs experience impacts with other objects in the nest. Egg shells are designed to be sufficiently strong and breaking of normal eggshells in nests is rather infrequent. However, eggshells are still required to be weak enough that the hatching chick can break though the shell.  It is an interesting compromise.
The shell thickness (hence the pore length) increase with egg weight as shown on the slide
Greater shell thickness will imply that gases will diffuse through the shell less quickly.  The effect of greater shell thickness on exchange of gases is compensated by the increase in pore area - remember that Fick's law of diffusion says that water loss is determined by total pore area divided by the pore length (shell thickness). 
The pore area (mm2) increases with egg weight (in grams) according to the following relation  Apore =  0.0092 W1.236  while the pore length goes up as Lpore =  0.0513 W0.456 
This means that gas conductance per day changes with egg weight as Apore x Lpore  or W0.78  -  Interestingly, the incubation time changes as W0.217  - such that the total water loss during the incubation of the egg is W0.78W0.217 or W - proportional to the egg weight.  This all makes good sense when we use the laws of physics to understand the variation of shell thickness, pore area with egg weight!
The next slide summarizes the various allometric scaling relations pertaining to avian eggs:

Let us look at some deviations observed from the trend indicated by the scaling relations and try to understand the reasons:



Example 1:  The single egg of Cassin’s Auklet (body mass 165 g) weighs about 29 g.  The incubation time for a 29 g egg is predicted as 25 days and shell thickness equal to 0.24 mm.  The actual incubation time of 38 days is considerably longer than the 25 days predicted for eggs of this size.  The measured shell thickness is 0.23 mm - the same as predicted for 29 g egg weight.  In order to preserve water loss during incubation to an acceptable level, the Auklet egg has about half as many pores as expected from allometric scaling relationship. The number of pores was estimated as 3295 while the expected value would be 6020.  I do not know why auklet eggs have long incubation time but the strategy to manage water loss from the egg makes sense. 
Example 2: Adaptation to Altitude: Birds breed up to 8500 meters in the Himalayas.  Incubation of eggs at high altitudes raises several issues.  The atmospheric pressure decreases with altitude and the rate of diffusion of gases across the egg shell is correspondingly affected.
From the slide, we note that relative to sea level, the air pressure is reduced to 35% at 8500 meters and 62% at 4000 meters.  Note that the atmospheric pressure at sea level is 760 torr.  Because molecules move more freely at lower density, the overall diffusion of oxygen, carbon di-oxide and water molecules through the pores of the egg shell is increased at higher altitudes.  

I shall consider the diffusion of water and oxygen through the egg shell in more detail here:


WATER VAPOUR:  The egg has a limited supply of water and at sea level most eggs, regardless of size, lose about 13 to 18% of its initial weight as lost water vapour during incubation. The internal temperature of an egg is about 38 C, and inside the egg the water vapour is in saturated equilibrium at a pressure of about 50 torr. The measured water loss per day for different egg weights is shown in the slide 



The rate of water loss depends on the water vapour pressure difference between the inside and outside of the egg.  To achieve the measured amount of water loss, optimum nest water vapour pressure should be about 30 torr, corresponding to 42% humidity.  The incubating bird ensures that humudity in the nest is maintained at the correct level.


At higher altitudes, the increased rate of diffusion produces increased water loss.  Birds adapt to live and breed at higher altitudes by producing eggs with a lower effective pore area.

This compensation limits the water loss through the eggshell at higher altitudes to be the same as at sea level.  

Rahn has measured the pore area of birds at different altitudes and found reduced pore areas as follows:

Red-winged blackbird eggs at 2410 m altitude had total pore area reduced to 0.72 of the total pore area for bird eggs at 87 m altitude.
Indian chicken eggs at 3500 m altitude had total pore area reduced to 0.65 of the total pore area for bird eggs at 220 m altitude.
While this adaptation of pore area reduction solves the matter of controlling water loss from the egg, it raises a problem for the supply of sufficient oxygen to the growing embryo.  

OXYGEN:  The partial pressure (concentration) of oxygen decreases with altitude and with reduced pore area, the egg has to find ways of supplying sufficient oxygen to the embryo. All living beings must adapt to the reduced oxygen concentration (hypoxia) at higher altitudes (60% of sea-level concentration at 4000 meters). Avian embryos, at high altitudes, do not have the benefit of maternal protection against hypoxia as in mammals. However, avian eggs do hatch successfully at altitudes up to 6500 m or even higher.  

Avian eggs have evolved different strategies to solve the problem of hypoxia leading to successful hatching at high altitudes.  A discussion of strategies in detail is outside the scope of this blog, however a common feature is that all bird embryos have blood hemoglobin (Hb) with high affinity for oxygen.  


Example 3: Penguin's Thick Eggshells - An Adaptive Trait:  Sea birds that nest on hard surfaces lay thick eggs to prevent breakage of eggs; thick eggshells are stronger as strength of the eggshell increases as square of the shell thickness.   
I shall discuss here the example of penguin species, Magellanic Penguins (Spheniscus magellanicus) incubate their eggs on hard substrates with little nesting material—all circumstances that could lead to high rates of egg breakage. However, Magellanic Penguin eggs are seldom broken -  low breakage rates attributable to thick eggshells. 
Average weight of a Magellanic Penguin Egg is 128 g and from the scaling of eggshell thickness (L) with egg weight (W), I would expect that L should be 0.52 mm.  The measured average value of L is 0.81 mm - 56% thicker than expected for the size of the egg. How the extra calcium for the thicker eggshell is provided is a good indication of adaptive strategy. 
Penguin eggshells contain 36% calcium or about 5 g calcium per egg.  I quote the way female penguin supplies the requires calcium from the original paper:
















Another adaption strategy that penguins employ is that their eggs are quite pointed.  This ensures that they roll in a circle and do not fall off the cliff on which they are being incubated.

The following two slides show the pointed eggs of some penguin species.  


Example 4: Why are the Kiwi Eggs so big??

The kiwi (Apteryx) egg is huge. In proportion to its body size, the female kiwi lays a bigger egg than almost any other bird. In fact, kiwi eggs are six-times as big as normal for a bird of its size (see the first two slides).An X-ray of kiwi before she lays her egg. Photo: Otorohanga Kiwi House


A large egg has some advantages.  Most bird eggs are 35-40% yolk but the kiwi egg is 65% yolk.  The nutritious yolk produces kiwi chicks that hatch fully feathered and are independent. The yolk continues to sustain the chick for the first few weeks of its life.  By that time, chicks can provide for themselves and kiwi parent seldom have to feed their offspring.

Why the kiwi egg is so large has been a subject of discussion; the matter is by no means settled but some interesting ideas have been put forward - 
An earlier suggestion was by Stephen Gould that the big size of the kiwi egg is simply a relic from when the kiwis were much bigger birds.  In New Zealand, until a 1000 years ago there were no major ground-dwelling egg-eating predators to encourage a shrunken egg and discourage the loss of mobility that comes from carrying such a large egg.
Lively debate has continued over the past few decades and the most recent DNA analyses appear to indicate that  the extinct Madagascan Elephant birds are the closest relatives of the New Zealand kiwi.  This is fascinating research and has lot to say about how and when flightless birds spread over the globe and are now found in all continents. 

Final Word:   It is interesting to note that many properties of avian eggs scale with egg size which itself scales with bird size in a systematic manner.  In itself, the scaling is to be expected from simply increasing the bird weight - everything else remaining the same.  However, environmental condition have required that avian eggs adapt to the external conditions and this is the case in many instances.  A serious deviation from the scaling trend line may point to some peculiar circumstance and this can lead to some fundamental change in the way we interpret that piece of evidence.  New Zealand kiwi is a good example of such a situation.


It is my pleasure to thank Professor Dee Boersma for his help in giving me information about Magellanic penguins.




Wednesday, 1 June 2016

Nature's Amazing Spectacle: Island Formation by an Underwater Volcano

Blog Contents; Who am I?
Wonderful and amazing things happen in nature all the time - auroras (dancing northern lights) are probably the most spectacular of them all.  Earthquakes, volcanoes, tsunamis, hurricanes, lightning are some of the manifestations of nature's gigantic energy.  Luckily, we now understand the reasons behind such amazing spectacles but they happen often enough to lose their wow factor.  
A rare event, even though well-understood, still has the power to excite.  Remember the first picture of the blue earth taken by astronauts from space and the excitement that it had caused.

Live observation of new land being formed in the South Pacific Ocean by the eruption of an underwater volcano (a seamount) was accidentally made in 2006.  We all know that there are underwater volcanoes and they are as active as the run-of-the-mill volcanoes we see on land.  These extinct volcanoes, seamounts and guyots, are part of the structure of the oceanic crust.  In fact, the highest mountain in the world is a seamount - Hawaii's Mauna Kea, a dormant volcano that is more than 30,000 feet tall measured from its base - that is taller than Mount Everest!



As two continental plates move apart from each other (generally about 2 cm per year amounting to 2000 km in 100 million years), it opens up a crack in the earth's crust. Molten magma extrudes out from the crack, cools to form ocean ridge on either side of the crack (rift valley).  Lot of the loosely deposited ridge is weathered by ocean currents and in time, the continental plates move further apart and also the ridge loses its height.  
Seamount and guyots which are raised oceanic crust due to extinct volcanoes move with the plates.  If originally the top of the seamount had risen above ocean water level then the wave action would have eroded the top and the flat top seamount becomes a guyot.  As they move away from the plates, their distance below the ocean water level increases - they sink.

If the volcanic eruption deposits enough magma, the lava (solidified magma) can stick out of the ocean surface and forms a temporary island.  Such islands do not always last for ever and most disappear after a period of days to moths or a few years.

How an island is formed is depicted by the following figure
Surtseyan Eruption-numbers.svg

1: Water vapour cloud     2: Cupressoid ash
3: Crater        4: Water       5: Layers of lava and ash
6: Stratum     7: Magma conduit    
8: Magma chamber      9: Dike

Regular volcanic activity can create permanent islands - Hawaiian islands are the best example of a series of islands created by underwater volcanic eruption. 

The wow factor comes from the uniqueness of an observation when such an island is being formed in real time.  
This is exactly what had happened in 2006 in the South Pacific near the Vava'u Islands in Tonga.  I describe the amazing experience of the crew of the yacht Maiken in their own words:


The crew of the Yacht Maiken were sailing through the South Pacific near the Vava'u Islands in Tonga when they noticed that the water in the distance has gone a strange colour.  
The crew documented the phenomenon in a series of remarkable pictures as they sailed into the formation to investigate, not realizing that a volcano was erupting just a few miles away
As the crew approached, the sea mysteriously turned to stone as the volcano pushed up new land



A beach in the middle of the sea: Before long, the land mass had bubbled up out of the ocean.  One of the crew, Fredrik Fransson told Discover magazine'We looked out and, in front of us, it was as if there was no more sea. It was 'like the Sahara with rolling hills of sand as far as the eye could see'.
They hadn't run ashore, but had instead found themselves surrounded by a huge raft of floating pumice stone



'Then we saw a black pillar (of smoke) shooting up into the air, and we understood that it had to be a volcano,' said Mr Fransson, adding that they navigated cautiously towards the plume.

'It was kind of a smouldering, smokey stuff. It looked like coal, and when there was an eruption, we could see the new material piling up on it.'
They then watched as an island grew before their eyes with each explosion in an area where there should be an underwater seamount called Home Reef.



Underwater eruptions are thought to occur dozens of times a year, but normally in remote areas or at depths inaccessible to humans. 
Eight months after the island's birth, some of it had washed up in Queensland, Australia, some 2,000 miles away.

A more recent island formation happened in December 2014.

In late December, an undersea volcano in the Polynesian island kingdom of Tonga began erupting. About 60 kilometers (40 miles) north of Tongatapu, the two small islands of Hunga Tonga and Hunga Ha'apai sit atop a large seamount. These volcanic islands stand just 128 and 149 meters (420 and 490 feet) above sea level. The new eruption occurred just offshore of Hunga Ha'apai. 
According to news reports, fishermen spotted signs of an eruption on December 19, and a photographer on the island of Tongatapu observed steam plumes on the horizon on December 24. Dense cloud cover prevented other remote observations for several days.
The following natural-color images from December 29 and 31, 2014, show the waters around Tonga, Hunga Tonga, and Hunga Ha'apai, as observed on by the Moderate Resolution Imaging Spectroradiometer (MODIS) on NASA’s Terra satellite. A white plume rises into the sky on both days.  The plume extended 3 kilometers (2 miles) into the sky. The discolored water nearby suggested an underwater release of gases and rock or the disturbance of sediment by the eruption.
Hunga Ha'apai is part of the Tonga-Kermadec volcanic arc and is part of the very active Pacific Ring of Fire. The last reported eruption occurred in 2009.

island1.jpg

December 29, 2014 Photograph of the two Islands


island2-rex.jpg
December 31, 2014 Photograph of the two Islands with a new island formation

I hope this blog has provided a glimpse of an exciting natural phenomenon. 
I am grateful to Dr Prabhakara Bhatt for bringing this matter to my attention.
Post-script:  As one would expect, formation of an island by underwater volcanic eruption is not a unique event and has been happening throughout Earth's history.  It is the observation of such an event in detail that I felt was worth writing about.  Professor Gerry Peterson (of UMASS) has pointed out to me that the island of Surtsey off the southwest coast of Iceland formed in a series of more or less continuous underwater volcanic eruptions during 1963 to 1967.  Surtsy (meaning Surtur's Island  - Surtr being a fire giant of Norse mythology), at the end of 1967 was 174 metres tall and 2.8 square kilometers in area. Here is a picture of Surtsey as it looks now. 
Modern Surtsey

The island has a protective cover of solidified magma and is expected to survive for a few centuries.  Its current area is 1.4 km^2 and has a height of 155m.












Thursday, 26 May 2016

Controlling Malaria - Are GM Mosquitoes the Answer?


Blog Contents - Who Am I?

...there is serious concern that malaria parasites are once again developing widespread resistance to antimalarial drugs...

Malaria has been with us since prehistoric times and has killed more people than any other disease.  Some even claim that malaria has been responsible for the death of half of the people who ever lived - I find it difficult to justify. It is more likely that half of the people who ever lived contracted malaria.

Last year, 200-300 million people contracted malaria with 500,000 deaths. Controlling malaria must be our number one priority. Major efforts have been made in the past with some success - malaria cases have fallen significantly (500 million people used to contract malaria annually) in the past 100 years but it seems that they are rising again.  Figure from http://targetmalaria.org/why-malaria-matters/
(Click on a slide to view its full page image; press escape to return to the main text)



Malaria is common in Africa, Asia, South America and the South Pacific - home for over three billion people.  With increase in tourism and global warming, it is likely that malaria will also become more common in Europe and North America where cases of malaria are already happening.

Malaria is caused by a parasite.  Human to human transmission of the malaria parasite can only happen through mosquitoes.  The difficulty in controlling malaria stems from the tenacity of the parasite which can develop resistance to drugs rather efficiently; and of course mosquitoes fight their way through any measures used in the past to control their populations. 
To understand this better, we need to look at how the disease progresses in humans (and for that matter in other animals). Both the humans and mosquitoes are essential for malaria to spread.




Malaria may be controlled either by eliminating the vector mosquito or by killing/disabling the parasite.  Both methods have been tried in the past.  

Parasite Control:  The parasite may be made ineffective by using drugs. The slide lists the four main parasites that infect humans.
Unfortunately, all these parasites have developed resistance to antimalarial drugs and in some areas none of the known drugs are effective any more.  The situation is very serious. I refer to some detailed analysis in the Wiki.

Mosquito Control:  This is the subject that this blog is about.  As malaria spreads through mosquito bites, it can help if we can reduce the mosquito population by eliminating their breeding sites, their access to humans by using mosquito nets, repellents etc. or by killing them with insecticides.  All these methods are currently used and have helped in substantially reducing the cases of malaria infections. 
Mosquitoes have developed resistance to insecticides.  In the next slide, I reproduce the conclusions of a recent review 

Besides the traditional approaches mentioned above, there are other methods of controlling mosquitoes numbers. These methods depend on somehow affecting the mosquito reproduction cycle - either by using radiation or by genetic manipulation.  We look at these in the following: 

Sterile Insect Technique (SIT):  Sterile male mosquitoes are released in large numbers and compete with wild male mosquitoes to mate with the females.  Females that mate with sterile males either produce no offsprings or weakened ones which die prematurely.  This results in a reduction of total mosquito population.  Sterile mosquitoes are released repeatedly to control or even eliminate mosquitoes in the area.  
Sterile insects may be produced by nuclear or X-ray radiation. The problem with this method is that irradiation generally weakens the male insects and they are not  able to compete effectively with their wild counterparts in finding females to mate. Nevertheless, this method have had some notable successes:  For example, in the eradication of 
the screw-worm fly from USA, Mexico & Libya; the Mexican fruit fly; the tsetse fly from Zanzibar; the Mediterranean fruit fly from Chile, Peru & Mexico and the melon fly from Okinawa.
SIT may be summarized by the following slide.  In the slide R1, R2, R3 are three releases of sterile mosquitoes.



An alternate strategy might be to use genetically modified (GM) mosquitoes.  The beauty of a GM approach is that it is target specific and only affects the malaria transmitting Anopheles mosquitoes without harming other types of mosquitoes and insects.
There are two approaches that appear promising.  
1.  RIDL (Release of Insects with Dominant Lethality)
In RIDL, pioneered by Oxitec Ltd., male mosquitoes are genetically modified so that their offsprings die before they mature. There is a series of slides that explains the RIDL in detail.  I shall go over the method RIDL briefly but refer to the slides for details.  
To start with, it will be useful  to understand the mosquito life-cycle -- a mosquito has four stages in its development and takes about two weeks to develop from an egg to a functioning adult.
In RIDL, male mosquito is given a dominant lethal gene. On mating with a female in the wild the gene is transferred to the egg and prevents development of the adult mosquito.
So far, most work on RIDL has been done not on mosquitoes which spread malaria, but on the mosquito Aedes aegypti which is the vector for dengue fever. In spreading dengue only one mosquito species is involved and is a better candidate for field trials.
There have been several field trials of RIDL - in Great Cayman Island and Brazil where 80-95% suppression of wild mosquitoes populations were achieved over limited size areas.  




There is a well presented TED Talk by Hadyn Parry that introduces the background to dengue epidemic and comments on results of Oxitec trials.

2. Target Malaria Approach:  Target Malaria Group operates in sub-Sahara countries and has been developing genetically modification techniques for controlling the mosquito species Anopheles gambaie which is the active vector in the region. 

The method works along the following lines:   
Some single celled organisms produce enzymes, called nucleases, that can cut specific sequences of DNA.  
When introduced in the malaria mosquito, these nucleases identify and cut through essential genes, such as fertility genes targeted or genes key to pathogen transmission.  The interrupted genes will no longer function.
Two of the main areas the researchers are currently focusing on are biasing the sex ratio of mosquito populations and reducing female fertility with the aim of controlling the female mosquito population and hence the incidence of malaria infection.  
Biasing the sex ratio:  The idea is to decrease the number of female mosquitoes relative to males.  The sex determining chromosomes are XY for males and XX for females.  In order to produce female offspring, two functional X chromosomes - one from each parent - are required.
Nuclease enzymes (image 1) identify (image 2) and cut through several key sites on the X chromosome in the sperm of male Anopheles gambiae which leads to a fragmentation of this chromosome (image 3). When these males reproduce, they can still pass on a functional Y chromosome to their offspring, but they cannot pass on a functional X chromosome due to its fragmentation (image 4). This results in a bias toward male (XY) offspring.
The team at Imperial College, London in June 2014 successfully distorted the sex ratio of a laboratory population, as over 95% of the offspring produced by modified Anopheles gambiae were male, with only 5% being female (see the following two slides). By comparison, under normal circumstances, a 50:50 split between male and females would be expected, meaning that the GM modification reduces the number of females produced by 10-fold.


Reduce Female Mosquito Fertility:  This strategy focuses on using nucleases to knock out genes that are key to fertility in female Anopheles gambiae mosquitoes. The approach could significantly reduce the prevalence of malaria because the number and productivity of females in a population determines future population size. 
In order to knock out female fertility genes, the nucleases are designed to identify the specified genes and cut through them. When this stretch of DNA is repaired, the nuclease gene is copied and inserted into the cut site, interrupting the original gene and preventing it from working properly.
A female that has one copy of this fertility gene disrupted will be able to reproduce normally, but when both copies within her chromosomes are disrupted, the female cannot produce viable offspring.
The team at Imperial College has designed these nucleases so that they are only active in the cells of the mosquito that make the sperm and the eggs. Due to the preferential copying mechanism of these nuclease genes in the sperm and eggs, an individual initially containing only one copy of the gene will transmit it to many more offspring than normal.
As fertility genes are fully disrupted in females that inherit two copies of the nuclease gene, this should lead to an overall reduction in the population.
Looking Forward:  GM mosquitoes, as described above, hold great promise for controlling malaria.  GM is species specific and targets only the vector population leaving other mosquito species totally unaffected. There is disquiet about releasing GM species in the wild as one can not predict with absolute certainty how it will affect the rest of the biosphere. In the case of RIDL GM mosquitoes, they die after a few weeks and the GM genes die with them.    
It appears that the GM methods are relatively safe.
One also needs to weigh the situation when millions of people are infected by malaria every year which results in great loss of economic activity and loss to the communities. This level of tragedy must be addressed and it seems to me that the negative arguments against GM are weak in this case.
Another alternative that I have not discussed here is the development of a malaria vaccine. In January 2016, WHO published the status report  and it is not clear that a malaria vaccine would be available for wider use in the near future.
What seems a sensible strategy at present is to develop the GM technology which appears to hold excellent promise at least for limited area eradication of malaria.  The traditional method for mosquito population control like spraying, and avoiding exposure to mosquitoes like medicated mosquito nets along with traditional parasite control medication must be used in conjunction with control of mosquito populations using GM technologies.

I acknowledge some very willing support from Dr Luke Alphey, formerly of Oxitec Ltd. and Dr Tony Nolan of the Target Malaria Team at Imperial College, London.  This has helped me to understand the subject better, make it more accurate and improve this blog feature.

UPDATE:  (August 2020):  Florida has just announced trial of genetically modified mosquitoes. 750 million Aedes aegypti, they carry several diseases such as Zika, dengue, chikungunya, yellow fever, will be released.  The mosquito, named OX5034, has been altered to produce female offspring that die in the larval stage, well before hatching and growing large enough to bite and spread disease. Only the female mosquito bites for blood, which she needs to mature her eggs. Males feed only on nectar, and are thus not a carrier for disease.  It will be interesting to see how the trial goes.
No news of any vaccines yet!

I would love to hear your views about this topic of great public interest.  
Please comment here or write to ektalks@yahoo.co.uk